Absolute Life Chiropractic

October 25, 2007

Breast Cancer Industry A Scam? Support Education, Not Medication

Filed under: medicine — kyle @ 1:04 pm

Wednesday, October 24, 2007 by: Mike Adams

This is the second annual publication of NewsTarget’s “Education, Not Medication” program designed to teach women the truth about how to prevent and even cure breast cancer. This disease is 90 percent preventable, mostly using completely free therapies. The breast cancer industry does not want women to be made aware of these free therapies because most of the better-known non-profits in the area of breast cancer are, themselves, dependant on revenues from the companies that profit from the disease.

The breast cancer industry is now run by corporations that profit from women who receive breast cancer treatments. With nearly all breast cancer nonprofits being subjugated by drug companies, the FDA censoring alternative cancer solutions, and the mainstream media wildly exaggerating the benefits of near-useless cancer drugs like Herceptin, there’s hardly a message heard about breast cancer today that doesn’t have a profit motive behind it.

“Breast cancer has been transformed into a market-driven industry. It has become more about making money for corporate sponsors than funding innovative ways to treat breast cancer.” - Health Studies researcher Samantha King, author of Pink Ribbons Inc.

The emphasis on breast cancer “screening,” and the circus of holding breast cancer awareness months is, of course, all about recruiting more women into a system of treatment that generates profits for drug companies. Using fear-based tactics of recruitment (like telling women, “You’ll die in six months if you don’t undergo chemotherapy…”), the breast cancer industry manages to corral women of all races and ages into treatments that actually harm far more women than they help. New research, for example, shows that certain classes of chemotherapy drugs are so dangerous to human health that they cause heart failure in many women who use them. The drugs are called anthracyclines, and the research was published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (October, 2007).

Chemotherapy is so dangerous to the heart, liver, kidneys and brain that the very act of screening for cancer tumors with mammography machines ultimately causes harm to most patients. Find that hard to believe? Researchers at the Nordic Cochrane Center in Denmark studied 500,000 women to determine the results of breast cancer screening programs. They found that for every one woman helped by breast cancer screening, ten were harmed through false diagnosis or unnecessary treatments that devastated their health.

“What seems like good and obvious advice in everyday life is not always scientifically or medically sound”, said Peter Gotzsche, MD, director of the center. “So we might say there is a benefit of one but a harm of 10 from screening for breast cancer.” You can read more about that story at www.NewsTarget.com/020829.html

In other words, breast cancer screening is surprisingly harmful to women. That’s partly because the procedure itself irradiates the breast tissue and actually causes cancer, but also because practically any screening result producing a questionable blur on the final image may result in a woman being manipulated through fear into undergoing aggressive, toxic cancer treatments even when they never had breast cancer in the first place. (False positives are extremely common in breast cancer screening, and in some cases, the machinery is incorrectly calibrated and doesn’t even meet radiology standards.)

Preventing prevention

And yet breast cancer screening is the only form of “prevention” offered by the cancer industry. But it isn’t prevention, it’s detection. Breast cancer screening does nothing to educate women how to really prevent breast cancer, nor does it teach women how to change their diets and lifestyles so that breast cancer never develops in the first place. In fact, the strategy of the cancer industry today can be best described as waiting for women to get cancer, then treating it with toxic drugs that just happen to generate huge profits for pharmaceutical companies.

While tens of millions of women are developing undetectable, early-stage breast cancer right now, the cancer industry does nothing. They will not tell these women how to halt the growth of cancer tumors; they will only wait until the cancer becomes large enough to see on a screening test, and then they will scare the women to death with harmful, authoritative medical demands and toss them into chemotherapy — a treatment that causes permanent, irreversible harm to the brain, heart, liver, kidneys and other organs.

Yet even the World Health Organization admits that 70 percent of all cancers can be prevented through simple changes in food and lifestyle. That number is probably conservative, though. My own opinion is that 90 percent of all cancers can be prevented through simple food and lifestyle changes. Yet no one in the cancer industry seems interested in teaching any of these strategies to women. In the cancer industry, there is no incentive to teach women how to avoid breast cancer, because to do so would eliminate a future customer! Billions of dollars in revenue are at stake here, and the cancer industry is banking on the continuation of this disease among the population.

That’s why I started the Education Not Medication program. It is a humble effort to teach women how to prevent their own breast cancer through scientifically-supported natural health strategies that are easy to understand and simple to follow. They include things like eating more broccoli and garlic, getting more natural sunlight on your skin (to generate the anti-cancer nutrient Vitamin D, which has recently been shown to prevent an astonishing 77 percent of ALL cancers!) and avoiding cancer-causing chemicals in manufactured foods (such as sodium nitrite, found in bacon, sausage and virtually all packaged meats). A more detailed list is offered below.

The cancer industry depends on more cancer

The cancer industry remains silent about these cancer prevention solutions. Ever wonder why? It’s because the livelihood of the industry depends on more cancer! If cancer rates plummeted by 70 percent or more, the industry would be devastated. The incomes, egos and power positions of cancer industry operators depend entirely on the continued spread of cancer among the population.

Ever notice that cancer centers are not called, “Anti-Cancer Centers?” You see them in virtually every city and state across the country: The Washington Cancer Center, or the San Francisco Cancer Center. Here in Arizona, we have a massive, new building being constructed, and it’s named the Arizona Cancer Center. These are all monuments to cancer, and they are usually for-profit businesses constructed for the purpose of making money from a woman’s disease. They turn cancer into profit, and they depend on the continuation of cancer to stay in business.

That’s why there’s no real effort underway to teach women how to prevent breast cancer. There’s no program in place to teach women about the anti-cancer effects of sunlight and vitamin D (in fact, cancer industry groups like the American Cancer Society run public service ads warning people about sunlight!), there’s no honest effort to teach women about the natural anti-cancer medicine founds in certain foods, and no one is telling women the truth about the cancer-causing chemicals in perfumes, laundry detergent, cosmetics and personal care products. Recent research shows that even air fresheners are contaminated with phthalates, and new details about cancer-causing chemicals in household products seem to emerge every week.

But when it comes to preventing cancer, the cancer industry is silent. Why should they say anything, anyway? If they teach women how to prevent breast cancer, they lose customers. Besides, the scheme they’re running right now is working brilliantly. They maximize revenues and profits by preventing prevention and waiting for women to get cancer, then treating them with high-profit pharmaceuticals, radiation and surgical procedures. They have the easiest business model in the world: All they have to do is keep their mouths shut about what causes cancer, and wait for new customers to fill the cancer centers. And to help them out, corporations, media organizations and volunteers (many are women!) actually help them raise more money!

Women raising money for cancer industry non-profit groups makes about as much sense as Jews raising money for Hitler. The cancer industry is exploiting these women, using their bodies to generate profits!

It’s time to teach genuine cancer prevention to women

The cancer industry has been getting away with this scam for years, but I say enough is enough. It’s time to declare, “The Emperor has no clothes!” and that the best way to help protect the lives of women is to teach them how to avoid breast cancer rather than waiting for them to get it.

And doing so is surprisingly simple. All you have to do is raise awareness about the things that cause breast cancer vs. the things that prevent breast cancer. This can be done through public service announcements, information handouts, or even internet campaigns like this one.

I also suggest that all these cancer treatment centers donate 100 percent of their profits to cancer prevention campaigns. It’s wrong to profit from a woman’s cancer, is it not? If these businesses really cared about stopping cancer, they’d refuse to profit from the disease and, instead, use the money to help stop cancer in future generations of women (and men, for that matter).

What an idea, huh? That these ultra-wealthy non-profits and billion-dollar corporations might spend some money on teaching women how to prevent cancer…

If it ever really happens, of course, it will only be as a cover-your-ass reaction to public awareness about the corporatization of the breast cancer industry. As word spreads, these non-profits will have to do something to save their reputation, so they’ll start running tiny “prevention” campaigns to save face. But underneath the facade, make no mistake: cancer is big, big business, and the cancer industry is driven by profiting from a woman’s body, not protecting it from cancer.

“[The cancer industry is] a market-driven industry that feeds off breast cancer survivors.” - Health Studies researcher Samantha King, author of Pink Ribbons Inc.

The real answers to breast cancer prevention

Here, for the benefit of women everywhere, is a partial list of the things that cause cancer and things that don’t. You’re not going to find full descriptions and citations here, as that would require an entire book all by itself, but this is a very useful reference list that tells the truth about what causes or prevents cancer in the human body.

18 things that CAUSE cancer: (in no particular order)

  • Smoking cigarettes
  • Mammography radiation - see articles on mammograms
  • Chemotherapy and radiation
  • Perfumes and fragrance products
  • Cosmetics and personal care products - see articles on personal care products
  • Home cleaning products, including laundry detergent, dryer sheets, etc.
  • Drinking non-organic milk or eating non-organic dairy products
  • Hydrogenated oils and trans fatty acids - See Poison In the Food or articles on hydrogenated oils
  • Plastic food containers - includes plastic lining inside food cans
  • Sodium nitrite - found in most processed meats, see articles on sodium nitrite
  • Pesticides, PCBs, chlorine and other chemicals
  • Acrylamides (formed during high-heat food processing such as frying)
  • Watching television / lack of exercise
  • Severe emotional distress or relationship stress
  • Refined sugars / refined grains
  • Dry cleaning chemicals
  • Hair color chemicals
  • Nail polish remover

22 things that PREVENT cancer:

The cancer industry attacks nearly all genuine cancer solutions

After examining this list, it’s not difficult to notice something quite curious: The cancer industry promotes many things that cause cancer while attacking most things that prevent cancer. Naturopathic doctors who once prescribed laetrile for cancer patients, for example, have been run out of the country or arrested. Herbal product companies have been censored to such a degree that none dare tell the truth about the anti-cancer effects of their own products, and even broccoli growers and marketers are scared into remaining silent about the remarkable, scientifically-proven anti-cancer effects of broccoli.

In other words, if you want to know what the cancer industry supports or attacks, just check to see which list it’s on. If it’s on the list of things that prevent cancer, the cancer industry (including most of its doctors, oncologists, non-profits and government regulators) will be against it. If it’s on the list of things that cause cancer, they will likely promote it. The cancer industry, you see, isn’t interested in stopping cancer. It depends on the disease!

The exception to this is, of course, tobacco. That’s a substance that doctors once gladly promoted in magazine advertisements, claiming that smoking was good for your health and even improved your teeth! But today, the tobacco scam has long since been revealed, and even conventional medicine is now squarely against this substance that they once strongly promoted.

The American Medical Association, by the way, used to actually run ads for cigarettes in its flagship medical journal, JAMA. Doctors can always be bought off and made to promote whatever poison is making the most money this decade (these people have no shame). In the 1950’s, it was cigarettes. Today, it’s pharmaceuticals and chemotherapy. Different drugs, same scam. But money was always — and IS always — the bottom line for conventional medicine. Today, doctors promote chemotherapy, which is far more toxic than smoking!

October 19, 2007

Filed under: medicine — kyle @ 8:37 am

Parents use religion to avoid vaccines

By STEVE LeBLANC, Associated Press WriterThu Oct 18, 4:21 AM ET

Sabrina Rahim doesn’t practice any particular faith, but she had no problem signing a letter declaring that because of her deeply held religious beliefs, her 4-year-old son should be exempt from the vaccinations required to enter preschool.

She is among a small but growing number of parents around the country who are claiming religious exemptions to avoid vaccinating their children when the real reason may be skepticism of the shots or concern they can cause other illnesses. Some of these parents say they are being forced to lie because of the way the vaccination laws are written in their states.

“It’s misleading,” Rahim admitted, but she said she fears that earlier vaccinations may be to blame for her son’s autism. “I find it very troubling, but for my son’s safety, I feel this is the only option we have.”

An Associated Press examination of states’ vaccination records and data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that many states are seeing increases in the rate of religious exemptions claimed for kindergartners.

“Do I think that religious exemptions have become the default? Absolutely,” said Dr. Paul Offit, head of infectious diseases at Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia and one of the harshest critics of the anti-vaccine movement. He said the resistance to vaccines is “an irrational, fear-based decision.”

The number of exemptions is extremely small in percentage terms and represents just a few thousand of the 3.7 million children entering kindergarten in 2005, the most recent figure available.

But public health officials say it takes only a few people to cause an outbreak that can put large numbers of lives at risk.

“When you choose not to get a vaccine, you’re not just making a choice for yourself, you’re making a choice for the person sitting next to you,” said Dr. Lance Rodewald, director of the CDC’s Immunization Services Division.

All states have some requirement that youngsters be immunized against such childhood diseases as measles, mumps, chickenpox, diphtheria and whooping cough.

Twenty-eight states, including Florida, Massachusetts and New York, allow parents to opt out for medical or religious reasons only. Twenty other states, among them California, Pennsylvania, Texas and Ohio, also allow parents to cite personal or philosophical reasons. Mississippi and West Virginia allow exemptions for medical reasons only.

From 2003 to 2007, religious exemptions for kindergartners increased, in some cases doubled or tripled, in 20 of the 28 states that allow only medical or religious exemptions, the AP found. Religious exemptions decreased in three of these states — Nebraska, Wyoming, South Carolina — and were unchanged in five others.

The rate of exemption requests is also increasing.

For example, in Massachusetts, the rate of those seeking exemptions has more than doubled in the past decade — from 0.24 percent, or 210, in 1996 to 0.60 percent, or 474, in 2006.

In Florida, 1,249 children claimed religious exemptions in 2006, almost double the 661 who did so just four years earlier. That was an increase of 0.3 to 0.6 percent of the student population. Georgia, New Hampshire and Alabama saw their rates double in the past four years.

The numbers from the various states cannot be added up with accuracy. Some states used a sampling of students to gauge levels of vaccinations. Others surveyed all or nearly all students.

Fifteen of the 20 states that allow both religious and philosophical exemptions have seen increases in both, according to the AP’s findings.

While some parents — Christian Scientists and certain fundamentalists, for example — have genuine religious objections to medicine, it is clear that others are simply distrustful of shots.

Some parents say they are not convinced vaccinations help. Others fear the vaccinations themselves may make their children sick and even cause autism.

Even though government-funded studies have found no link between vaccines and autism, loosely organized groups of parents and even popular cultural figures such as radio host Don Imus have voiced concerns. Most of the furor on Internet message boards and Web sites has been about a mercury-based preservative once used in vaccines that some believe contributes to neurological disorders.

Unvaccinated children can spread diseases to others who have not gotten their shots or those for whom vaccinations provided less-than-complete protection.

In 1991, a religious group in Philadelphia that chose not to immunize its children touched off an outbreak of measles that claimed at least eight lives and sickened more than 700 people, mostly children.

And in 2005, an Indiana girl who had not been immunized picked up the measles virus at an orphanage in Romania and unknowingly brought it back to a church group. Within a month, the number of people infected had grown to 31 in what health officials said was the nation’s worst outbreak of the disease in a decade.

Rachel Magni, a 35-year-old stay-at-home mother in Newton, Mass., said she is afraid vaccines could harm her children and “overwhelm their bodies.” Even though she attends a Protestant church that allows vaccinations, Magni pursued a religious exemption so her 4-year-old daughter and 1-year-old son, who have never been vaccinated, could attend preschool.

“I felt that the risk of the vaccine was worse than the risk of the actual disease,” she said.

Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, one of the leading vaccine skeptic groups, said she discourages parents from pursuing religious exemptions unless they are genuine. Instead, Fisher said, parents should work to change the laws in their states.

“We counsel that if you do not live in a state that has a philosophical exemption, you still have to obey the law,” she said.

Even so, Fisher said, she empathizes with parents tempted to claim the religious exemption: “If a parent has a child who has had a deterioration after vaccination and the doctor says that’s just a coincidence, you have to keep vaccinating this child, what is the parent left with?”

Offit said he knows of no state that enforces any penalty for parents who falsely claim a religious exemption.

“I think that wouldn’t be worth it because that’s just such an emotional issue for people. Our country was founded on the notion of religious freedom,” he said.

In 2002, four Arkansas families challenged the state’s policy allowing religious exemptions only if a parent could prove membership in a recognized religion prohibiting vaccination. The court struck down the policy and the state began allowing both religious and philosophical exemptions.

Religious and medical exemptions, which had been climbing, plummeted, while the number of philosophical exemptions spiked.

In the first year alone, more parents applied for philosophical exemptions than religious and medical exemptions combined. From 2001 to 2004, the total number of students seeking exemptions in Arkansas more than doubled, from 529 to 1,145.

Dr. Janet Levitan, a pediatrician in Brookline, Mass., said she counsels patients who worry that vaccines could harm their children to pursue a religious exemption if that is their only option.

“I tell them if you don’t want to vaccinate for philosophical reasons and the state doesn’t allow that, then say it’s for religious reasons,” she said. “It says you have to state that vaccination conflicts with your religious belief. It doesn’t say you have to actually have that religious belief. So just state it.”

October 15, 2007

VACCINE TRUTH

Filed under: medicine, Vaccination — kyle @ 7:32 am
MOTHERLY INSTINCT: ALWAYS RIGHT!
inspired by Dr. Dan Yachter
“I KNEW THAT IT WAS WRONG…MY INSTINCTS TOLD ME, BUT I STILL WENT AHEAD AND DID IT BECAUSE THE DOCTOR TOLD ME TO.”
   

 

“THE DOCTOR TOLD ME IF I DIDN’T VACCINATE MY CHILD, I WOULD HAVE TO LEAVE HIS OFFICE.”
 

“THE SCHOOL NURSE YELLED AT ME, SAYING THAT IF I DIDN’T VACCINATE MY CHILD I WAS A HORRIBLE MOTHER.”
 

“I VACCINATED MY CHILD BECAUSE I THOUGHT, NO SHOTS, NO SCHOOL.”
 

“WELL, EVERYBODY AT WORK WAS GETTING A FLU SHOT, SO I THOUGHT I WAS SUPPOSED TO AS WELL.”


 

YOU SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE!
 “I am convinced that the increase of cancer is due to vaccination.” Forbes Laurie, MD, Medical Director of the Metropolitan Cancer Hospital, London
 “The most frequent disposing condition for cancerous development is …vaccination and re-vaccination.”  Dennis Turnbull, MD (30 years cancer researcher). All quotes cited in Vaccines, Are They Really Safe and Effective? by Neil Miller
  QUESTION: ARE THESE VACCINATIONS DANGEROUS? 
62 studies from 30 worldwide laboratories link the polio vaccine to brain tumors, bone cancers, lung lining cancers and leukemia.
 Children vaccinated with DPPT (or MMR) had 14 times more asthma and 9.4 times more eczema than non-vaccinated children. McKeever TM, Lewis SA, Smith C. Does vaccination increase the risk of developing allergic disease?: A birth cohort study. Winter Abstract supplement to Thorax, 2002; 57: Supplement III
      The number of injuries and deaths from the Hepatitis B vaccine are 20 times greater than that from the disease. Mothering Magazine.May/June 1999.
       Hepatitis B vaccine is linked to lupus and multiple sclerosis (MS). The role of vaccines in arthritis and autoimmunity – ‘vaccinosis’ : a dangerous liaison? J Autoimmun 2000;14(1):1-10
       “The risk of a serious vaccine reaction may be 100 times greater than the risk of hepatitis B….asthma and diabetes… autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder have [increased greatly ] since the introduction of many new vaccines….” Jane Orient, MD, Executive Director Association of American Association of Physicians and Surgeons.
        “The results of suppressing measles and other infectious diseases [by vaccinations] are cancer and other auto-immune and chronic diseases.” Scheibner V. Immunization: The Medical Assault on the Immune System. Blackheath, Australia: Author, 1993; xxii.
 Question: Did vaccines eliminate diseases?
       “Nearly 90% of the total decline in mortality (scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough, and measles) between 1860 and 1965 occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization.” Illich, I. Medical Nemesis. Chapter 1-The Epidemics of Modern Medicine, NY: Bantam Books 1976
      Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines: FDA and CDC “Guilty” of Misconduct, Says Senate Report …”Key among the substantiated allegations was the finding that: “FDA inappropriately utilized Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines regarding the dangers of mercury in vaccines containing thimerosal.” Thus, the FDA may have miscalculated the toxicity of Thimerosal in vaccines routinely administered to millions of pregnant women and children.
October 1, 2007 CoMeD Sci. Advisor [Dr. King (Lake Hiawatha, NJ) 973-997-1321]                    

     

  • A former chief vaccine control officer of the FDA, J. Anthony Morris, has said: “There is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza. The producers of these vaccines know that they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”

By the time a child is 6 months old they are to be injected with 48 vaccines; at 18 months 70, and at 4-6 years at least 89!! (was 74 in 2002)
 10.69% of children immunized (with pertussis) got asthma.
      There was 1 case of asthma out of 91 who had no vaccinations at all.
Odent ME, Culpin EE, Kimmel T, Pertussis vaccination and asthma: is there a link? Letter. JAMA. 1994; 272(8):593. 
      “Between 15 and 20% of American school children are considered learning disabled with minimal brain dysfunction directly caused by vaccine damage.” Coulter HL. Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain. Washington, DC: Center for Empirical Medicine. 1990.
                               

     

  • Outbreaks have occurred in 100% vaccinated populations. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. US Govt. 12/29/89/38(S-9):1-18.
  • “80% cases of measles are  contracted in vaccinated people.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. US Govt. 6/6/86/35(22):366-70.

“[Pertussis] infections are common in an immunized population…more prevalent than previously documented.” 98% were vaccinated in this population. He Q, Vijanen MK, Arvilommi H et al. Whooping cough caused by Bordetella pertussi and Bordetella parapertussis in an immunized population. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280:635-637.
 In 1975 Japan raised the minimum age of vaccination from 2 months to 2 years. Crib death, infantile seizures, meningitis and other infectious diseases in infants virtually disappeared. Japan went from 17th in infant mortality to 1st.
 Question: What if we stopped vaccinating?
        When pertussis vaccination decreased (Sweden, the UK and Germany) pertussis deaths decreased. Trollfors B. and Rabo E. Whooping cough in adults. British Medical Journal. 1981; 696-697 (September 12)  cited in Coulter H. & Fisher BL A Shot in the Dark. NY: Warner Books 1985; 255-6.
        “Contracting and overcoming childhood diseases are part of a developmental process that actually helps develop a healthy, robust, adult immune system able to meet the challenges that inevitable encounters with viruses and bacteria will present later on.” Coulter HL. Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain. Washington, DC: Center for Empirical Medicine. 1990.
  HAVING CHILDHOOD DISEASES PROTECT YOU AGAINST FUTURE DISEASES:  Having 2 childhood viral infections reduced the coronary risk by 40%; 4 infections was associated with a 60% decreased risk; and 6 infections lowered the risk by 90%.
  KNOW THE TRUTH AND KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!
 The most powerful way to keep your family healthy and well is to make sure that you have their NERVE SYSTEM checked for subluxation. Subluxation is a deadly form of neurological INTERFERENCE. Another way to stay healthy is to avoid as many chemical interferences as possible. VACCINES add toxic waste to the human blood stream which destroys God-given healing potential and has been proven to set the body up for serious disease, including cancer!
 If you would like more information on vaccinations, then check out the following resources:   

  1. www.NVIC.org
  2. www.taap.info
  3. www.mercola.com

October 10, 2007

DANGER: FLU SHOTS AHEAD

Filed under: medicine — kyle @ 9:14 am

DANGER LURKING IN FLU SHOTS!

By Greg Ciola

October 8, 2007

It wasn’t until I went to my local grocery store (name withheld) recently that I realized how low pharmaceutical companies would stoop to propagandize the public with lies. While I was at the checkout counter a young woman bagging my groceries looked at me, smiled, and said: “Have you had the flu shot yet.” I was stunned.

I looked at her and asked: “Is your store management instructing you to ask everyone this?” She said ‘no’ but employees were encouraged to ask customers if they were interested in receiving the shot. I looked at this young woman with pity in my eyes and said: “There’s no way I would put that poison into my body.”

With curiosity about why someone would make such a bold statement, we engaged in conversation and I spent the next ten minutes giving her an earful. I asked her if she had any information on the shot and she graciously went over to the front desk to get a flyer outlining the reasons for getting the shot along with the store locations and times I could get it.

In big bold letters across the top of the flyer were the words: “TAKE YOUR SHOT!” In addition to the flu shot, they were also promoting pneumonia shots and tetanus/diphtheria shots. It was then and there that I realized I had to speak out against this insanity. According to the flyer, the flu is now a “DISEASE”. Can you imagine this? A disease implies something that needs medical intervention. I guess a cold, cough, headache, upset stomach or diarrhea could all be classified as diseases too.

I remember vividly when they first started pushing the flu shot years ago. It was originally marketed to the elderly and those with weakened immunity. Long gone are those days. There wasn’t enough money to be made (or enough people to poison) by selling to this select market. Now the shot is being promoted to everyone as some sort of flu panacea. Before you, your friends, co-workers, church members or anyone in your family are conned into taking the flu shot, here are some of the risks you need to know about.

Flu Shots Contain Toxic Agents

Did you know that the flu shot could contain anything from aluminum, formaldehyde, dangerous microorganisms, thimerosal (mercury), ethylene glycol, and other toxic adjuvants? In addition to these substances, the flu vaccine is prepared from the fluids of chicken embryos inoculated with the specific type (s) of influenza virus that supposedly protects against the strains federal health officials believe are most likely to be prevalent during the flu season. The effectiveness in preventing influenza often ranges from 30-40%. Not very encouraging considering the potential health dangers you may be opening yourself up to down the road from the toxic agents in the vaccine.

How is the human body supposed to build immunity by being exposed to neurotoxic poisons like mercury, formaldehyde, and DNA from animals? Mercury is the second most toxic material on the planet. The first is radioactive plutonium. To make thimerosal, they start with elemental mercury. Then, they hop it up 1,000 times by converting it to ethyl mercury. Then, they add aluminum to the vaccine that has a synergistic effect with the mercury, causing it to be 10,000 more toxic than elemental mercury. Mercury is used to sterilize the flu vaccine.

Consider this insanity; they tell us that it’s unsafe to touch, breathe or swallow the mercury from a broken thermometer yet it’s perfectly acceptable to inject the same poison directly into your body through the flu shot or other vaccines. In fact, you can’t even find mercury based thermometers on the market anymore. Don’t worry – Big Pharma knows what’s best for you!

Now let’s look at formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is classified as a toxic, colorless, water-soluble gas having a suffocating odor. It’s used predominantly in embalming fluid and vaccines as a disinfectant and preservative. There are no long-term safety studies that vaccine manufacturers can draw from to validate the effectiveness of the flu shot. Those that take the shot are the safety studies and only 10% of the side effects associated with vaccines are ever reported to federal agencies. In fact, a simple search on the Internet will lead you to literally thousands of websites and stories that report on vaccine injuries, including the flu shot. What you find will not put you at ease if you’ve bought into this myth.

If the public were fully informed and aware of all the ingredients that went into the flu shot, there would be a mass exodus away from it. Unfortunately, your doctor won’t tell you anything about this; the news media will not report the truth about these contaminants or the risks; the CDC is a controlled front group; pharmaceutical companies have an agenda; and mass retailers pushing the shots don’t seem to care even after being warned about the potential dangers of administering vaccines.

Flu Shots Help Spread The Flu

It’s rather ironic that what the flu shot is supposed to prevent actually seems to have an opposite effect. In recent years, flu season seems to be programmed into society. When October rolls around, all of the sudden there’s a massive outbreak of the cold and flu. Is it just coincidence that this happens to coincide with the exact time that millions of people receive the flu shot? Health officials would like us to believe that this is why we should all be vaccinated.

Another deception perpetuated by the vaccine cartel is that the flu shot contains inactive or dead viruses. If these viruses were completely inactive, then the shot would never stimulate an immune response. The flu shot contains ‘attenuated’ virus. In the book, “The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination Is Not Immunization,” Tim O’Shea, a highly recognized authority on the dangers of vaccines, sums up what attenuated really means:

Attenuated means half-killed. The infectious agent is weakened so that it is just below the threshold of being able to trigger an inflammatory response in 99% of people. By allowing the implantation of an attenuated virus or bacteria into the body, we have done something nature would never permit. We have violated the sanctity of the bloodstream. We have tricked the immune system into not mounting an all-out response to a foreign agent. If the vaccine’s microorganisms were not attenuated, the powers of the natural immune system would join together to repel and attack the invader.”

The evidence suggests that those that receive the flu shot could be contagious for weeks and spread germs to the general public. Not only does the shot manipulate the immune system, it contains foreign microorganisms that can easily replicate in the body. It is ridiculous for the CDC to say that none of these germs are contagious. There are many well-respected health experts who believe that the number of people coming down with the flu would be drastically reduced if flu shots weren’t administered One of the best ways to avoid the flu is to stay away from people who have it. This includes staying away from those who have recently received a flu shot.

Flu Shots Do Not Guarantee Immunity

Doctors and pharmaceutical companies ignore the statistics of those who get the flu shot and still get the flu. Instead, we’re bombarded with propaganda about how the shot helps prevent the flu. In 2004 for example, numerous news reports stated that the flu shots administered in 2003 were not even capable of protecting people against the influenza strains that we were around during that flu season. It’s the same every year. It’s all a big guess. Here’s a story worth noting.

In 2003, a Canadian nursing home sent out a memo that stated all employees had to take the flu shot. Those that refused would be put on a leave of absence and possibly face the loss of their job. Not believing the hype, one employee (a personal friend of this writer) stood on her principles and refused the shot while her entire staff went along with the order. Much to her amazement, everyone that took the shot came down with a bad case of the flu except for her. There are reports like this all over North America but there’s a virtual media blackout on this truth because there’s an agenda behind the promotion of the flu shot.

Trying to predict what influenza strains will be most prevalent during flu season is a crap shoot. The flu shot does not protect against all throat, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and ear infections. It does not protect you against SARS or the much hyped Bird Flu. The flu shot only gives temporary immunity at best. What we’re not told, however, is that the flu shot actually weakens the immune system in the long run. Nobody knows for sure what negative effects the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde or other adjuvants will have on the immune system. Some of these agents are known to interfere with your DNA. How do we know that the DNA won’t miscode genetic information to the cells? And even if you don’t come down with the flu after getting a shot, your body may be much more susceptible to getting sick from other viruses and bacteria that it would normally be able to fend off. Is it all worth the risks? That’s the decision you have to make.

Author Tim O’Shea made some very noteworthy statements in his book regarding the flu shot:

A vaccine supposedly contains some version of the causative agent, in a weakened form With influenza, by the time the virus is isolated, cultured for manufacture, and distributed to the population, the virus that is causing the current incidence of influenza has usually changed to a form completely unaffected by the vaccine. Michael Decker, MD of Aventis, the flu vaccine manufacturer admits: ‘By the time you know what’s the right strain, you can’t do anything about it.’

This doesn’t even take into account the unique form influenza virus takes within each person. Yet with flu shots, it’s One Size Fits All  everyone gets the same vaccine. If it really worked, you wouldn’t have to come back next year. Natural immunity is for life.

Ever notice that people who get flu shots all the time keep getting the flu? Think that could have anything to do with not giving the body a chance to put immunity together itself?

Vaccines Assault The Blood & Violate Biblical Law

The Bible tells us in Leviticus 17:11-12 that: For the life of the flesh is in the blood No soul of you shall eat blood, neither shall any stranger that sojourneth among you eat blood.

God has made it very clear throughout the scriptures that blood is sacred. When you understand the importance of health and nutrition and how critical your blood is in this process, it’s easy to see why the flu shot, and all vaccines for that matter, violate Biblical law and all the laws of health. Your bloodstream is either a river of life to all the cells in your body or a river of disease and death. You can’t inject foreign viruses, bacteria, blood contaminants, DNA disrupters, neurotoxins, and preservatives into your body and somehow think you’re going to get health.

Vaccines bypass the natural defensive capabilities of the liver, kidneys, colon, lymphatic system, and the immune system and deliver toxic waste directly into the body. Your body doesn’t know what to do with mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, chicken embryos, and microorganisms when it’s fired into it like a missile. Some people can go into shock. Others have died and many have been seriously injured shortly after receiving a flu shot. Guillain-Barré, temporary Multiple Sclerosis-like illness, breathing problems, hoarseness, wheezing, hives, paleness, dizziness, weakness, and rapid heartbeat have all been reported as side effects from the flu shot.

Let’s use common sense here. If God didn’t want us to eat blood or mix unclean substances in our bodies, he certainly didn’t want them injected directly into our body either. All vaccines contain substances that the Bible deems unclean and unfit for our bodies. The question really boils down to this: Are you going to trust God for your immunity or are you going to trust man? There are many safe and natural alternatives that are available to ward off infections but you’ll never hear about them from the media. They thrive on fear in order to create consumption.

Satanic Sorcery Is Alive And Well!

Most people are unaware that the word “pharmaceutical” is derived from the Greek word “pharmakeia,” which means magic, sorcery, and witchcraft. The symbols of the pharmaceutical companies are extremely meaningful. For example, the winged staff with a serpent wrapped around a pole is the ancient magic wand of the pagan god Hermès. In an attempt to prevent people from linking with our Creator, pharmaceutical companies use their drugs, vaccines, spells and potions to contaminate the blood of an unsuspecting public.

The biggest disappointment comes from Christian leaders who should know these truths and proclaim them loudly from the pulpit. Instead, many churches throughout North America are actually promoting the flu shot to their congregation. In some instances, churches are even being used as outlets to administer the shot. How sad to see the body of Christ being deceived by Satan’s sorcery.

Natural Alternatives

There are many very effective, natural products available to help boost your immune system and keep you well during flu season without needing to inject neurotoxic poisons and contaminants into your body. Your immune system is the only thing that prevents you from being riddled with opportunistic infections and a host of other chronic illnesses. You can’t build immunity and shield the immune system with vaccines and poisonous pharmaceutical drugs. You can only modulate the immune system through natural methods.

Enhancing the immune system means you don’t just boost one or two components. There are 22 different instruments or components to the immune system including T-cells, B-cells, Natural Killer cells (NK cells), macrophages, lymphocytes, leukocytes, monocytes, interferon, gamma globulin, interleukin 1,2,3,4, and other white blood cells. All 22 components must be orchestrated simultaneously like a symphony, in order to maintain optimum immunity.

Conclusion

It’s better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man. God did not make a mistake when he created us. The human body is equipped with one of the natural wonders of nature: An Immune System. If you are concerned about the plagues and epidemics coming upon the world, read Psalm 91. If we are to stand steadfast until the end, it is with the LORD on our side. Don’t become a victim of the fear and panic spread by the Pharma cartel and media. Our hope is in the King of Heaven and Earth who promised us deliverance. Remember this next time someone tries to con you into getting a flu shot.

Footnotes:

1. O’Shea, Tim, The Sanctity Of Human Blood: Vaccination Is Not Immunization, eighth edition, pages 40, 41, 90, 91, Two Trees, San Jose, CA, 2004.
2. Tunsky, Gary, The Battle For Health Is Over pH, Crusador Enterprises, Orlando, FL, 2004.
3. Ciola, Greg, GMOs: Beware of the Coming Food Apocalypse, Crusador Enterprises, Orlando, FL, 2004.
4. The Book of Jasher, Artisan Publishers, Muskogee, OK.
5. Balch, Phyllis A., CNC, Prescription For Nutritional Healing, The A-Z Guide To Supplements, Avery, New York, NY, 2002.
6. Balch, Phyllis A., CNC, Prescription For Nutritional Healing, Third Edition, Avery, New York, NY, 2000.
7. Balch, Phyllis A., CNC, Prescription For Herbal Healing, An Easy-to-Use A-to-Z Reference to Hundreds of Common Disorders and Their Herbal Remedies, Avery, New York, NY, 2002.
8. Goldberg, Burton, Alternative Medicine, The Definitive Guide, Celestial Arts, Berkeley, CA, 2002.
9. www.vaccinetruth.org
10. www.vaclib.org
11. www.truth.info

 

 

The Neurotoxic Puzzle

Filed under: nerve supply — kyle @ 8:48 am

Neuro 

Do you know this puzzle???If you have never participated in our EXTREME MAKEOVER II then your LIFE and families LIVES depend on it. The saddest thing I see is when patients don’t get involved in their care and don’t take full advantage of what our clinic has to offer. Our community is NOT being educated on what true health is really all about. Previous Extreme makeover participants have learned the most cutting edge knowledge on how to achieve superior health and well-being. They’ve also learned that drugs and surgery are not the answer to their health problems.

The Maximized Living Lifestyle is what it takes to achieve longevity, vitality, energy, disease-free and medication-free living. Living a maximized living lifestyle requires an understanding of the neuron-toxic puzzle:

1. The healing diet, which involves eating God foods instead of altered and modified man foods.

2. Eliminating heavy metal poisoning from the Mercury contained in Vaccines, ‘Silver’ fillings, and environmental toxins found in poisonous household cleaning chemicals, carpets, furniture, personal skin care products, etc.

3. Eliminating exposure to mold and detecting other Biotoxins like Lyme in our environment

4. And making sure that the most important system of the human body is functioning at peak potential. A family living the Maximized Living Lifestyle understands that a healthy nerve system absent of interference is the most important aspect and is at the core of getting well and staying well for life!

I want to thank all of our previous participants and if you have not gone through the program NO MORE EXCUSES, this is a one day program that CHANGES lives. If you know people who are sick, suffering, and on multiple medications this PROGRAM is for them. If you know someone who wants to improve their health, taking it to the next level, they can’t miss the EMO II. Do whatever it takes to get them here. Your commitment to your health will yield a huge return. An ounce of prevention equals a pound of cure! Only by understanding what is going on inside of your body and only by getting tested, do you really know the present status of your health and the inherent risks of degenerative disease development.

 

REMEMBER: Sign up at the front desk for this AWESOME workshop Saturday, October 13th From 10am to 3pm  

Call 360-260-6903 to reserve your spot NOW, SEATS GO FAST! There are only 20 seats left.

 

MIND ROT

Filed under: medicine — kyle @ 8:39 am

CONSPIRACY THEORY?

After practicing chiropractic for over 13 years, I still find it hard to believe that the majority of the new patients walking through my clinic door are ingesting over 6 different medications/day. The most recent data on the U.S. medical system reports that in the year 2006 over 3.1 billion drug prescriptions were written; this equates into 11 prescriptions for every man, woman and child living in America. Is this justified? Can anybody really make the argument that this is necessary? If this was making us healthier, then maybe I could agree that we need the drugs. But in light of the fact that the United States is ranked as the sickest industrialized nation on the planet and has the highest rate of degenerative disease, I would have to disagree…there is no way this is working! And in fact, millions are getting killed from this chemical way of thinking.          

BETTER LIVING THROUGH BETTER CHEMISTRY?  OR THE DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA?          

*CASE IN POINT: STATIN (CHOLESTEROL LOWERING) DRUGS NOW CAUSING MYSTERIOUS LIFE-THREATENING AMNESIA. (according to Dr. Sherry Rogers, M.D.)      

 Doctors in our country have reported 1,000’s of cases of amnesia while taking the non-essential cholesterol lowering medications. The problem lies in the fact that once they report the problem with any drug they are usually shunned. Regardless of their credentials, from Nobel prize winner Linus Pauling right on down to psychiatrists, surgeons, internists, and anyone else who dares to question drugs. They are either maligned, ignored, and otherwise discredited, or distracted with trumped up investigations.   Doctors in our country have reported 1,000’s of cases of amnesia while taking the non-essential cholesterol lowering medications. The problem lies in the fact that once they report the problem with any drug they are usually shunned. Regardless of their credentials, from Nobel prize winner Linus Pauling right on down to psychiatrists, surgeons, internists, and anyone else who dares to question drugs. They are either maligned, ignored, and otherwise discredited, or distracted with trumped up investigations.The bottom line is that there are airline pilots, airline traffic regulators, and drivers on our high-speed highways who are already balancing coffee, sandwiches and cell phones while on these drugs, as over 50 million Americans take them. We are in a sea of dangerous minds that have had cholesterol stolen from their brains. When the critical period strikes for each mind where it suddenly cuts out and stops functioning is a total crapshoot.    Doctors in our country have reported 1,000’s of cases of amnesia while taking the non-essential cholesterol lowering medications. The problem lies in the fact that once they report the problem with any drug they are usually shunned. Regardless of their credentials, from Nobel prize winner Linus Pauling right on down to psychiatrists, surgeons, internists, and anyone else who dares to question drugs. They are either maligned, ignored, and otherwise discredited, or distracted with trumped up investigations.The bottom line is that there are airline pilots, airline traffic regulators, and drivers on our high-speed highways who are already balancing coffee, sandwiches and cell phones while on these drugs, as We are in a sea of dangerous minds that have had cholesterol stolen from their brains. When the critical period strikes for each mind where it suddenly cuts out and stops functioning is a total crapshoot.Robbing the body of cholesterol deprives the brain of DOLICHOLS, messengers or neurotransmitters, damages our immune systems, which then ushers in cancers, not to mention ligament and tendon ruptures, heart failure, and fatal muscle/joint weakness and pain and finally death from Rhabdomyolysis (the rapid breakdown of skeletal tissue).

   Doctors in our country have reported 1,000’s of cases of amnesia while taking the non-essential cholesterol lowering medications. The problem lies in the fact that once they report the problem with any drug they are usually shunned. Regardless of their credentials, from Nobel prize winner Linus Pauling right on down to psychiatrists, surgeons, internists, and anyone else who dares to question drugs. They are either maligned, ignored, and otherwise discredited, or distracted with trumped up investigations.The bottom line is that there are airline pilots, airline traffic regulators, and drivers on our high-speed highways who are already balancing coffee, sandwiches and cell phones while on these drugs, as We are in a sea of dangerous minds that have had cholesterol stolen from their brains. When the critical period strikes for each mind where it suddenly cuts out and stops functioning is a total crapshoot.Robbing the body of cholesterol deprives the brain of DOLICHOLS, messengers or neurotransmitters, damages our immune systems, which then ushers in cancers, not to mention ligament and tendon ruptures, heart failure, and fatal muscle/joint weakness and pain and finally death from Rhabdomyolysis (the rapid breakdown of skeletal tissue).Statin drugs like Lipitor, Crestor, and Mevacor have been proven to accelerate disease & death! Cholesterol is a major constituent of every cell in the human body! It is absolutely critical to the health of the human body. True story: for one company CEO, his wife asked him to pick up some grocery items as long as he was going out to the hardware store. Hours later when he opened his trunk at the hardware store to put his package inside, he was startled to find the grocery items and the same hardware items, with their receipts confirming he had already purchased them that day. But where had those stolen hours gone? Too bad he didn’t forget to take his Lipitor!THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF because over 150,000 people are estimated to have this amnesia at some point. Will they be on the highway in front of you and your precious family. Or will he/she be the pilot of your plane? Or will it just be the worker at a nuclear facility or the fellow who somehow put PCB/lead containing fire retardant into cattle feed, raising the cancer incidence enormously throughout the US Midwest, or the guy who mistakenly put melamine into pet food?         

· If you would like to read more about this topic of MIND ROT & the issue of possible DRUG COMPANY CONSPIRACY, check out these 2 books: “Lipitor, Thief of Memory” and “Statin Drugs, Side effects, and the Misguided War on Cholesterol,” both by Duane Graveline, M.D.